In the ongoing effort to shed light on excessive Car Repair prices, we cannot discount the manufacturer's employment. During a spirited discussion in an automotive forum, the comments below rrn the Ray Fast highlight the role producer plays in taking money in the repair customer's wallet.
The discussion revolves around the difficulty of replacing an alternator within an Acura. The Acura, like all front wheel drive compact cars, has a transverse attached engine. Transverse engines are the ones mounted sideways. Because of the "sideways" design, the alternator has to be mounted low and found in the engine, making it frustrating and replace on the entire year and model we mentioned.
Front wheel drive has its good features, but can it be better than its rear-wheel travel and leisure predecessor? Front wheel drive has created additional repairs, none of which were necessary in years past. These repairs have been wasting your, the service customer, a fortune.
The shift to transverse engines and front wheel drive was a major marketing coup for an automobile industry. Vehicle manufacturers managed to dupe the marketplace at large into believing that this standard was somehow better than the previous convention connecting rear wheel drive.
[In reality] vehicles with transverse mounted motors and front wheel push systems are less continuous mechanically, less stable, and less efficient than their morning counterparts.
Advanced technology has compensated with the downfalls considerably; however, vehicles with traditional efficiency and traction systems using similar technology are more reliable, safer, and more effective. This is why high performance vehicles that are capable of applications requiring maximum steadiness "still" utilize inline sites and rear traction elements.
The answer to problem [Why is the alternator in such hard to reach place] lies in these: cars with transverse locomotives and front wheel drive are more cost-effective to build.
By assembling the power plant and traction system as such complete module, then dropping the whole thing as one unit to the car, automobile manufacturers save gobs of cash. The fact that cars are considerably less serviceable (for instance, certain components are virtually impossible to access without removing the engine and transmission) is obviously of little, if an overview, concern to the the most up-tp-date.
For that reason, anyone purchasing a new or used automobile should carefully evaluate the design, arrangement, and complexity of a potential purchase in relation to serviceability. The expense of having a car is not limited to the sticker price. If you drive it, you're eventually going to have to fix it.
Ray's comments speak to the rising costs with them Car Repair. Gone are the days of actually "fixing" cars. Now we frequently spend extra time throwing hard-to-reach, expensive parts in them.
Importantly, we need to remember that manufacturers have two most critical objectives: selling cars combined with selling parts. How long is needed, how much it bills, or how frustrated one such gets removing and solving components, means very little for those manufacturer. It doesn't affect their bottom line.
Fortunately, most manufacturers have moved away from "low-mounted" alternators (such as being the Acura in our discussion) because the elements: rain, snow, dirt cause them to fail prematurely. However, the remaining cons which front wheel drive along with a whole plethora of new manufacturer technological breakthroughs still cost the service clientele significantly in repairs.
(Comments from Ray Fast reprinted lawfully from the author).